Google Search
Custom Search
Sunday, March 3, 2013
Turn Texas into a blue state? One man is trying.
Jeremy Bird is trying the impossible, he's trying to turn Texas into a blue state. His site is called .Battleground Texas and his aim to get minority and democratic voters to the polls to put Texas on the list of so called battleground states. Now of course he faces many challenges. On our second part of Saturdays TYT Community show broadcast, our panel featured independent journalist Brad Friedman from Bradblog.com to discuss GOP voter suppression in states like Texas as well as the future of the GOP.
Why sequestration is bullshit designed to distract America
Last night I had the great opportunity to sit down with Brad Friedman from Bradblog.com on TYT Community to talk about sequestration. That $85 Billion a year we're cutting is a drop in the bucket compared to what we're really wasting in military fraud and waste. As well as fraud and waste in the federal reserve.
These Republicans are not conservative, they are pigs at the trough of our tax dollars, and as long as their friends profit, they will waste your money all day.
So what is sequestration? It's a made up crisis that was used to slash domestic spending, and while it does cut defense, it's not what the beltway, mainstream media is portraying it as.
Here is the discussion:
These Republicans are not conservative, they are pigs at the trough of our tax dollars, and as long as their friends profit, they will waste your money all day.
So what is sequestration? It's a made up crisis that was used to slash domestic spending, and while it does cut defense, it's not what the beltway, mainstream media is portraying it as.
Here is the discussion:
Make sure to subscribe to our channel http://www.youtube.com/user/TYTCommunity
And definitely check out http://www.bradblog.com/ for more of Brad's expert analysis.
Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Sequestration: Another manufactured crisis designed to take your money
All this week you're going to be hearing about the sequester. The spending cuts from both defense and domestic spending. But what you wont hear about is the truth. The sequester crisis was made up as a way to force cuts to social security and medicare.
They will say we need to cut those to protect defense spending, but it's not until you look at the absolute waste in the pentagon that you realize that their argument is bullshit.
For one, the sequester leaves funding alone for spending required for any active wars we are currently in. This whole plan will save the defense contractors that have absolutely defrauded the taxpayer (YOU) and still get contract deals.
In this video I spell out everything you need to know about the sequester:
They will say we need to cut those to protect defense spending, but it's not until you look at the absolute waste in the pentagon that you realize that their argument is bullshit.
For one, the sequester leaves funding alone for spending required for any active wars we are currently in. This whole plan will save the defense contractors that have absolutely defrauded the taxpayer (YOU) and still get contract deals.
In this video I spell out everything you need to know about the sequester:
Wednesday, February 20, 2013
President Obama's minimum wage increase proposal. (video)
Our Panel talks about the need for an increase in the minimum wage as well as common conservative myths surrounding the idea of raising it.
Thursday, February 7, 2013
No, I'm not gone
However I have been doing other projects. In addition to full time school I have been collaborating with a couple of friends to revive the TYT Community show, the first new episode should be up on the web soon.
I have also been editing, producing, and starring (not sure if that's the right word) in YouTube videos discussing current issues. It's like my blog, but without all the reading.
You can find it here: www.youtube.com\JCWaldorf
Please like and subscribe to my channel to help me continue to be independent.
I have also been editing, producing, and starring (not sure if that's the right word) in YouTube videos discussing current issues. It's like my blog, but without all the reading.
You can find it here: www.youtube.com\JCWaldorf
Please like and subscribe to my channel to help me continue to be independent.
Wednesday, January 16, 2013
The Presidents gun plan, common sense gun control
So today president Obama released a 23 point plan of executive actions he can take to help curb gun violence. While calling on congress do pass legislation such a ban on assault weapons and high capacity magazines.
The freakout from the right is amazing. Going so far as to target Obama's kids.
This is an ad released from the NRA that calls president Obama an "Elitist Hypocrite" for not wanting to put guns in school.
The whole is premise of this dumbass ad is to say "well Obama's kids get secret service guards so we should get guards too."
This is stupid, for one the president gets over 30 death threats a day, thirty!
I don't know any person that gets thirty death threats a day. Is it such a stretch that someone would threaten his family? OF COURSE! Of course they would, there are some crazy people out there.
Speaking of crazy, NRA president David Keene went on Mike Huckabees radio show and said this about the 23 executive actions
The political reality is that congress will not pass an assault weapons ban, it's not even on their radar. Sure you have Diane Finestein calling to put a ban on the floor, but come on. Do you really expect the Republicans to pass this? I'd be amazed if they even put it on the floor for a vote.
Well at least without massive public pressure.
You can bet the NRA and the gun lobby will be fighting any legislation tooth and nail, so if progressives want to see action on assault rifles and high capacity magazines, get ahold of your congressmen and let your voices be heard.
The president has done all he can do.
The freakout from the right is amazing. Going so far as to target Obama's kids.
The whole is premise of this dumbass ad is to say "well Obama's kids get secret service guards so we should get guards too."
This is stupid, for one the president gets over 30 death threats a day, thirty!
I don't know any person that gets thirty death threats a day. Is it such a stretch that someone would threaten his family? OF COURSE! Of course they would, there are some crazy people out there.
Speaking of crazy, NRA president David Keene went on Mike Huckabees radio show and said this about the 23 executive actions
“Make no mistake about it: Overall, this is an anti-gun agenda pushed by an administration that is a committed anti-gun administration,”And Mr. Wayne LaPierre had this to say:
“It’s not about protecting your children. It’s not about stopping crime. It’s about banning your guns … PERIOD!”So here we ago again. Yes president Obama proposed that congress pass an assault weapons ban, but I don't think he or the NRA have anything to worry about. Not with this congress.
The political reality is that congress will not pass an assault weapons ban, it's not even on their radar. Sure you have Diane Finestein calling to put a ban on the floor, but come on. Do you really expect the Republicans to pass this? I'd be amazed if they even put it on the floor for a vote.
Well at least without massive public pressure.
You can bet the NRA and the gun lobby will be fighting any legislation tooth and nail, so if progressives want to see action on assault rifles and high capacity magazines, get ahold of your congressmen and let your voices be heard.
The president has done all he can do.
Thursday, January 10, 2013
Why anything but very modest gun control is out of reach.
Yesterday I talked about Alex Jones and his pro-gun rant on CNN. I mentioned that gun control laws are not likely to be passed.
I want to explain here why I think that is, despite the continued use of guns in violent crime, the increase of mass shootings, the outrage primarily from the left and the polling data that shows that a great deal of Americans are open to some reform.
We still have a deep partisan divide over the issue of 2nd amendment rights.
And there is the fact that the words gun control are always mistakenly linked to the idea of banning all guns, which is NOT what gun control means.
Nonetheless, according to the Pew Research polling data more people feel safe with guns in the home.
Despite the data showing otherwise.
I want to explain here why I think that is, despite the continued use of guns in violent crime, the increase of mass shootings, the outrage primarily from the left and the polling data that shows that a great deal of Americans are open to some reform.
USA Today/Gallup Poll. Dec. 19-22, 2012. N=1,038 adults nationwide. Margin of error ± 4.
"Please say whether you favor or oppose each of the following: A law which would require background checks before people -- including gun dealers -- could buy guns at gun shows."
| ||||||
| Favor | Oppose | Unsure | ||||
| % | % | % | ||||
12/19-22/12
| 92 | 7 | - | |||
2/8-9/99
| 83 | 16 | 1 | |||
"Please say whether you favor or oppose each of the following: A law which would ban the sale and possession of high-capacity ammunition clips that can contain more than 10 bullets."
| ||||||
| Favor | Oppose | Unsure | ||||
| % | % | % | ||||
12/19-22/12
| 62 | 35 | 3 | |||
We still have a deep partisan divide over the issue of 2nd amendment rights.
Pew Research Center. Dec. 17-19, 2012. N=1,219 adults nationwide. Margin of error ± 3.4.
| ||||||
"What do you think is more important -- to protect the right of Americans to own guns, or to control gun ownership?"
| ||||||
| Protect right to own guns | Control ownership | Unsure/ Refused | ||||
| % | % | % | ||||
12/17-19/12
| 42 | 49 | 9 | |||
Republicans
| 69 | 27 | 4 | |||
Democrats
| 20 | 72 | 8 | |||
Independents
| 47 | 42 | 11 | |||
And there is the fact that the words gun control are always mistakenly linked to the idea of banning all guns, which is NOT what gun control means.
Nonetheless, according to the Pew Research polling data more people feel safe with guns in the home.
"Do you think that gun ownership in this country does more to protect people from becoming victims of crime, or does more to put people's safety at risk?" Options rotated
| ||||||
| Protect people | Put safety at risk | Unsure/ Refused | ||||
| % | % | % | ||||
12/17-19/12
| 48 | 37 | 16 | |||
Despite the data showing otherwise.
"Compared to homes without guns, the presence of guns in the home is associated with a 3-fold increased homicide risk within the home. The risk connected to gun ownership increases to 8-fold when the offender is an intimate partner or relative of the victim and is 20 times higher when previous domestic violence exists."
"Family and intimate assaults with firearms are 12 times more likely to result in death than nonfirearm assaults. This research suggests that limiting access to guns will result in less lethal family and intimate assaults."
-John Hopkins Bloomberg school of public health
You also have the NRA now having a negative approval rating because it's stance on arming teachers which is proving to be unpopular.
The NRA now has a negative favorability rating, with 42% of voters seeing it positively while 45% have an unfavorable view. That represents a 10 point net decline in the NRA’s favorability from the week before the press conference when a national poll we did found it at 48/41. Its image has taken a hit with both Democrats (from 29/59 to 22/67) and Republicans (71/19 to 66/18).The NRA’s focus on putting more guns in schools is likely what’s driving the decline in the organization’s image. Only 41% of voters support the organization’s proposal to put armed police officers in schools across the country, with 50% opposed. Democrats (35/57) and independents (38/51) both oppose the push and even among Republicans only a narrow majority (52/39) supports it.On the broader issue of giving teachers guns, only 27% of voters are supportive with 64% opposed. There’s bipartisan opposition to that concept with Republicans (35/50), independents (31/59), and Democrats (19/77) all standing against it. Gun owners (37/52) oppose it as well.The holidays and the fiscal cliff took a lot of the spotlight off gun control measures, but in general 53% of Americans say they support stricter gun laws with 40% opposed.
So despite all this why do I continue to think that there will be little action on gun control laws? Well for one we have divided government. We could hardly get a deal on the fiscal cliff passed in time, and that had a deadline where all Americans were going to be hit with tax increases.
Gun control legislation however does not have any imposed deadline, so the congress can continue to push it off until the general public forgets about it. That has essentially been the position of congress every time we have a mass shooting. Remember Columbine? Tuscon? Aurora? Wisconsin? Now Sandy Hook.
Now President Obama and Joe Biden do promise some action on gun control, but Obama has also promised to close Gitmo, raise taxes on people making over 250k a year, and not put entitlements on the table in order to deal with the deficit. So excuse me if I don't have faith in his ability to do what he says he will do when you look at his track record.
Another reason, and I'm going all philosophical on you now, is because we have a culture of fear. We have a media that sensationalizes tragedies to get ratings. We also have people like Alex Jones, Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh and Fox news spreading fear. Fear of the government, they often use Hitler and Mao as examples as to why any regulation is bad. Some Americans also fear minorities, Blacks and Latinos. Trayvon Martin is a great example of this, I think if Trayvon had been a white teenager in a hoodie there is a good chance Zimmerman would have let him be. There is sense of needing protection from the government and other Americans, as Alex Jones demonstrates during many of his paranoid rants.
So back to government, the gun manufacturers have a vested interest in making money, they are after all corporations, and with money they have the ability to spend that money on elections, influencing candidates. In 94% of congressional elections money determines the outcome. Gun manufacturers give money to the NRA, and the NRA uses it to give money to pro-gun politicians. If you take a stand on any type of gun control, your NRA funding is gone.
With all of these factors, and the efforts of many conservatives and libertarians alike that do not want to see any restrictions on their right to bear arms and contribute to the NRA, I'm convinced and saddened that right now, we may only only see token reform.
My advice to fellow progressives, if you want to see any movement on common sense gun regulation, you have to get the money out of politics so the people can decide, if a majority continues to want some tougher gun regulation than that is the only way.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)